A deputy reveals the map of the division within the Coordination Framework between the Sudanese and Maliki factions.

Member of Parliament Murtada Al-Ibrahimi revealed today, Thursday, the map of alliances and political changes within the coordination framework regarding the file of naming the candidate of the largest bloc, stressing the existence of a division between three fronts that support Al-Maliki and Al-Sudani and another that takes a neutral position.

In a televised statement monitored by Al-Maalomah News Agency, Al-Ibrahimi said, “The Coordination Framework map has been divided into three sections as of Wednesday night. The first section includes six leaders who support renewing the mandate of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, while three leaders support the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, and three others are adopting a neutral stance.”

He added, “The bloc supporting al-Sudani includes the Reconstruction and Development Bloc, the Badr Organization, the Wisdom Movement, the Sanad Movement, and the Sadiqun Movement.” He explained that “those supporting Nouri al-Maliki are the Dawa Party, the Supreme Council, and the Asas Gathering.”

Al-Ibrahimi indicated that “the section that remains neutral includes the Victory Coalition, the Determination Bloc, and the Virtue Party,” noting that “these figures reflect the nature of the ongoing movement within the framework’s forces to resolve the issue of the next prime minister.”

Almaalomah.me

Buy Dinar for $975!!

Iraqi Dinar – ONLY $975 per million. PLUS free FedEx shipping included (CONUS only). If you would like to buy (or sell) Dinar, please call 615-509-6256 (or text) or e-mail us at DinarUpdates@icloud.com

Al-Dhari: Sunni forces clarify their position regarding Nouri al-Maliki, the candidate of the Coordination Framework for Prime Minister

A leader in the Azm Alliance, Mohammed al-Dhari, revealed today, Thursday, that Sunni forces, with the exception of the head of the Taqaddum Alliance, Mohammed al-Halbousi, do not oppose the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki, the Coordination Framework’s candidate, for the premiership.

Al-Dhari told Al-Maalomah News Agency that “the Sunni National Council has not received any notification from the Coordination Framework forces regarding changing their candidate for the premiership, Nouri al-Maliki, or replacing him with another figure. Most Sunni parties, with the exception of the head of the Taqaddum Alliance, Mohammed al-Halbousi, have expressed their readiness to vote for the Coordination Framework’s candidate, Nouri al-Maliki, while emphasizing flexibility and not using a veto against any figure agreed upon by the Shiite forces. This step aims to achieve political stability and form a consensus government, away from political posturing.”

He added that “the moderate Sunni political forces, which reject Halbousi’s approach, are prepared to vote for the prime ministerial candidate chosen by the Coordination Framework, the main Shiite bloc, without objecting to any individual, including former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.” He explained that “the Sunni forces’ position aims to facilitate the formation of the Iraqi government and overcome political obstacles.”
He emphasized that “this stance comes in light of the Coordination Framework’s insistence on proceeding with al-Maliki’s nomination, despite the Trump administration’s objections.”

Almaalomah.me

The framework is facing the zero hour… Will it decide on its candidate for the premiership next Saturday, or will the deadline be extended for the remaining ten days?

Political and popular circles are turning their attention to the anticipated meeting of the Coordination Framework forces next Saturday, amid urgent questions about whether this meeting will represent the coup de grâce to end the deadlock in the prime ministership file, or whether it will turn into a new stage to postpone the crisis to a maximum of ten days.

Leaked information obtained by Al-Maalomah indicates that the options within the Shia political bloc have effectively narrowed down to two main contenders: current Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, who aspires to a second term bolstered by a record of service-oriented achievements, and Nouri al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law Coalition, who sees his electoral and political standing as a gateway to returning to the Prime Minister’s office.
Despite leaks attempting to promote a “compromise candidate” scenario as a middle ground to satisfy all parties, most leaders within the bloc and observers dismiss this proposal at present. They emphasize that the current phase cannot tolerate experimenting with shadowy figures, and that the decision will be clear among the prominent names being considered. This hinges on the outcome of the last-minute understandings before Saturday’s meeting, which may clarify matters or open the door to the final ten-day constitutional and political deadline.

In this context, MP Saud al-Saadi, head of the Rights Bloc in Parliament, ruled out on Thursday the possibility of the Coordination Framework leaders deciding on the largest bloc’s candidate for the next prime minister at their meeting next Saturday. He stressed the Framework’s commitment to the remaining constitutional deadlines.
Al-Saadi told the Al-Maalomah news agency that “continuous dialogue and communication is the only way to end the delay in finalizing the Coordination Framework’s candidate for the next prime minister,” emphasizing that “the Framework will not exceed the constitutional deadline, and the candidate will be chosen within the next ten days.”
He added that “the Rights Bloc supports any candidate who meets national criteria, foremost among them being a strong figure capable of leading the country through this phase and dealing with changes, and most importantly, being free from external dictates and not subject to American will.”
Al-Saadi explained that “the current phase requires a prime minister who prioritizes safeguarding sovereignty,” noting that “the selection process requires the consensus of all Coordination Framework leaders, and if this proves impossible, a two-thirds vote will be used to resolve the matter.”
In addition, Member of Parliament Murtada al-Ibrahimi revealed the map of alliances and political changes within the coordination framework regarding the file of naming the candidate of the largest bloc, stressing the existence of a division between three fronts that support al-Maliki and al-Sudani and another that takes a neutral position.

Al-Ibrahimi stated in a televised interview, monitored by the Al-Maalomah news agency, that “the coordination framework map was divided into three sections as of Wednesday night; the first includes six leaders who support renewing the mandate of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, while three leaders support the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, and three others adopt a neutral stance.”
He added that “the front supporting al-Sudani includes the Reconstruction and Development Bloc, the Badr Organization, the Victorious Bloc, the Wisdom Movement, the Sanad Movement, and the Sadiqun Movement,” clarifying that “those supporting Nouri al-Maliki are the Dawa Party.”

The Supreme Council and the Foundation Gathering.”
Al-Ibrahimi indicated that “the faction that remains neutral includes the Victory Coalition, the Determination Bloc, and the Virtue Party,” noting that these figures reflect the nature of the ongoing movement within the framework forces to resolve the issue of the next prime minister.
It is worth mentioning that the Coordination Framework postponed its meeting scheduled for Wednesday until next Saturday to discuss finalizing the selection of the largest bloc’s candidate for the next prime minister.

Almaalomah.me

Source: Al-Halbousi spent $160 million to prevent the election of Barzani’s candidate for the presidency.

A source in Anbar province revealed on Thursday that Mohammed al-Halbousi, head of the Progress Alliance, spent more than $160 million to prevent the election of Masoud Barzani’s candidate for the presidency.

The source told the Information Agency that “Mohammed al-Halbousi turned the parliamentary session to elect a new Speaker of Parliament into a marketplace for buying the votes of some MPs to secure the passage of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan’s candidate, Nizar Amidi, thus eliminating Barzani’s candidate and mobilizing support for his victory. This was also intended to send a message to Barzani that the will of the parties could be broken by the weapon of money.”

The source added that “Al-Halbousi succeeded in tipping the scales in favor of money by spending more than $160 million to prevent the election of Masoud Barzani’s candidate for the presidency, sending a message to the regional government about his ability to manipulate the position using political funds.” The source explained that “Al-Halbousi wanted to create a political maneuver using money to break Barzani’s grip and prevent his control and dominance over some Sunni political parties.”

The source further explained that “Al-Halbousi shifted the political discourse from dialogue to numbers and deals, which places the future of Sunni-Kurdish alliances before a new test of the resilience of political loyalties in the face of financial temptations.” The source emphasized that “Al-Halbousi’s maneuver highlights the state of division and political conflicts between the Progress Party and Barzani’s party.”

Almaalomah.me

The framework intensifies its discussions before Saturday’s decision… Al-Badri and Al-Sudani are the most likely candidates for the premiership.

The leadership of the Coordination Framework, which includes the ruling Shiite political forces in Iraq, is scheduled to hold a crucial meeting on Saturday at the home of Ammar al-Hakim, head of the National State Forces Alliance, to choose a candidate for the position of Prime Minister, especially with the shrinking of the legal period specified after the election of the President of the Republic.

In this regard, the leader of the framework, Amer Al-Fayez, told Shafaq News Agency that the framework is expected to reach an agreement in Saturday’s meeting to choose its candidate for prime minister, indicating that the most prominent candidates for this position are the current Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani, and Basim Al-Badri.

He confirmed that Nouri al-Maliki, the head of the State of Law Coalition, is still a candidate for prime minister and has not officially withdrawn his candidacy, despite media reports suggesting he might withdraw due to his diminished chances of obtaining the position as a result of the American “veto” imposed on him.

Regarding the existence of sharp political disagreements between the parties of the framework due to the delay in proceeding with the formation of the next federal government, Al-Fayez stressed that “there are no divisions within the framework, but rather there is a difference of views regarding the selection of candidates for the position of Prime Minister.”

On Wednesday evening, the coordinating framework decided to postpone its meeting scheduled for that night until next Saturday, after reaching “important” understandings regarding the leadership of the government.

This comes against the backdrop of a division within the coordination framework that split it into three wings due to disagreements over the candidate for the next prime minister, according to what a well-informed political source revealed earlier on Wednesday.

The political source told Shafaq News Agency on Wednesday that “the disagreements within the framework are no longer limited to differing viewpoints, but have developed into an actual split within the alliance into three main wings, which has cast a shadow over today’s meeting scheduled to be held at Humam Hamoudi’s house, with growing doubts about the possibility of postponing it to another date.”

He explained that “the first faction insists on nominating the leader of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, or any figure who enjoys his explicit support from among the proposed names, while a second faction is pushing for the renaming of the caretaker Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, while the third faction prefers to go for a compromise candidate who can gain wider acceptance within and outside the Shiite community.”

Shafaq.com

A $55 billion project to bypass the Strait of Hormuz… and Iraq is at the heart of the plan.

Gulf states, including Iraq, are considering building an alternative oil pipeline network to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, at an estimated cost of $55 billion, amid escalating geopolitical risks, according to an analysis published by Reuters.

The analysis indicates that imposing fees on tanker transit, even at limited levels, could constitute a significant financial burden on oil producers, prompting them to seek long-term alternatives that reduce dependence on this vital corridor.

Iraq stands out as a pivotal element in the project, as the plan includes the construction of two pipelines extending from its south through Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, reaching ports on the Arabian Sea, such as the port of Duqm and the port of Salalah, which would allow the export of oil directly to Asian markets without passing through Hormuz.

Despite the project’s cost, the analysis suggests it may be economically viable, as it roughly equals the potential revenue over approximately 25 years, and it also gives countries in the region, including Iraq, greater flexibility in exporting oil and reduces risks associated with maritime routes.

The project is also expected to be jointly financed by the beneficiary countries, with the cost distributed according to the volume of use, while implementation may take several years, which means continued reliance on the Strait of Hormuz in the near term.

Shafaq.com

America becomes a “major exporter” of oil for the first time since World War II

Reuters reported on Thursday that America has become a “major exporter” of oil for the first time since World War I due to events in the Middle East and disruptions to crude supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

Reuters reported that the United States almost became a net exporter of crude oil last week for the first time since World War II, as shipments jumped to near-record highs to meet demand from Asian and European buyers rushing to make up for Middle East supplies disrupted by the Iran war.

The war being waged by the United States and Israel against Iran has led to the biggest ever disruption in the global energy market, and Iranian threats to maritime navigation have blocked about one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas supplies from passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

Asian and European refiners that had relied on supplies from the region scrambled to find alternative shipments from anywhere possible, leading to a sharp increase in demand for oil from the United States, the world’s largest producer.

Analysts and traders say the United States is rapidly approaching its maximum export capacity.

Net crude imports, or the difference between imports and exports, fell to 66,000 barrels per day last week, the lowest level recorded in weekly data going back to 2001, according to U.S. government data released Wednesday.

Exports rose to 5.2 million barrels per day, the highest level in seven months.

According to the data, the United States has not been a net exporter of crude oil since 1943, on an annual basis.

Countries such as Greece have purchased American crude oil for the first time ever in the past few months.

Kepler ship-tracking data shows a tanker carrying 500,000 barrels of crude oil is en route to Türkiye, marking the first U.S. export to that country in at least a year.

Meanwhile, imports to the United States fell by more than 1 million barrels per day to 5.3 million barrels per day last week. The United States still imports a significant amount of crude oil because its refineries are designed to process heavier crudes than the light sweet crude it produces.

Matt Smith, an analyst at Kpler, predicted that US exports would reach approximately 5.2 million barrels per day in April.

Traders and analysts say the United States could export up to six million barrels per day, citing limited pipeline capacity and tanker availability.

Shafaq.com

Pakistan confirms US and Iran are ready to hold talks

Pakistani Foreign Minister Tahir Andarabi announced on Thursday that the United States and Iran are ready to hold a round of talks in an attempt to reach an agreement to end the war, but he did not specify a date for this round.

Andrabi said there was no information on where the second round of US-Iranian talks would be held, but that his country would keep communication channels open between the US and Iran.

He noted that contacts are ongoing to ensure the continuation of talks between Washington and Tehran, stressing that America and Iran are ready to hold talks and efforts are continuing.

He stressed that Pakistan’s efforts to reach an agreement between Washington and Tehran have international support.

Andrabi noted that Lebanon remains part of the ceasefire in effect, and stressed that peace in Lebanon is essential for peace talks, explaining that the nuclear issue is among the issues being discussed.

Shafaq.com

Exclusive: Maliki and Sudani resort to the 8/12 formula to resolve the prime ministerial candidate crisis

A source within the coordination framework revealed on Thursday the nature of the initial understandings reached regarding the selection of the next Prime Minister, indicating that the candidate who obtains two-thirds of the votes of the framework’s leaders wins the position, which requires time to finalize this initial agreement.

This comes against the backdrop of what the leaders of the coordination framework reached on Wednesday evening, as understandings between them regarding the leadership of the government led to the postponement of a crucial meeting until next Saturday.

A source close to the framework told Shafaq News Agency on Wednesday that “the leaders of the framework agreed to postpone the meeting that was supposed to be held this evening (Wednesday night) until Saturday, after reaching important understandings.”

He added that “the new understandings require more time to resolve the issue of the prime ministership.”

Returning to the nature of these understandings revealed by the source today, he explained to Shafaq News Agency that ” the initial understandings between the most prominent candidates of the framework, the leader of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, and the caretaker Prime Minister, Muhammad Shia al-Sudani, which led to the postponement of yesterday’s meeting, stipulate that whoever obtains the support of 8 out of 12 leaders of the Shiite House will proceed unanimously after the rest join the two-thirds automatically, and thus obtains the position of Prime Minister.”

He explained that “these understandings require more time to mature in a way that preserves the entitlements of all forces,” noting that “there are forces that have declared their neutrality, namely the Design Alliance, the Victory Coalition, and the Virtue Party, and they will join whoever will guarantee them the gains they aspire to.”

The source indicated that “the meetings between the Shiite forces are ongoing and may change the roadmap for the government palace before Saturday’s meeting, otherwise the disputes over the government formation file will continue amid push and pull,” stressing at the same time that “whatever results of the Iran-America negotiations will lead to will inevitably have an impact on resolving the matter.”

On Wednesday evening, the coordinating framework decided to postpone its meeting scheduled for that night until next Saturday, after reaching “important” understandings regarding the leadership of the government.

This comes against the backdrop of a division within the coordination framework that split it into three wings due to disagreements over the candidate for the next prime minister, according to what a well-informed political source revealed earlier on Wednesday.

The political source told Shafaq News Agency on Wednesday that “the disagreements within the framework are no longer limited to differing viewpoints, but have developed into an actual split within the alliance into three main wings, which has cast a shadow over today’s meeting scheduled to be held at Humam Hamoudi’s house, with growing doubts about the possibility of postponing it to another date.”

He explained that “the first faction insists on nominating the leader of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, or any figure who enjoys his explicit support from among the proposed names, while a second faction is pushing for the renaming of the caretaker Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, while the third faction prefers to go for a compromise candidate who can gain wider acceptance within and outside the Shiite community.”

Shafaq.com