Dinar NEWS Blog – Daily

Amid threats of US tariffs, Iraq remains the largest importer of Iranian goods, with purchases totaling $10 billion.

In recent days, the United States announced that any country that conducts trade with Iran will face a 25% tariff on its trade with the United States, a move that could include Iraq, which is among the Arab countries most closely linked to trade with Tehran.

The US decision comes at a time when Iran is witnessing its largest anti-government protests in years, within the context of a series of sanctions imposed by Washington on Tehran for years.

In this context, Middle East News reported on Wednesday that Iraq tops the list of countries importing Iranian goods, with purchases amounting to about $10 billion during the period between April 2024 and January 2025, followed by the UAE with about $6 billion, and then Turkey with $5.5 billion.

According to official data from the Iranian Customs Administration, the volume of non-oil trade between Iran and its fifteen neighboring countries reached $13.42 billion during the period from March 20 to June 21 of last year, with the exchange of about 23 million tons of goods.

In terms of exports, Iraq remained the primary destination for Iranian goods, with a value of $1.9 billion, followed by the UAE at $1.6 billion, then Turkey at $940 million, Afghanistan at $510 million, and Oman at $437 million. Imports from neighboring countries reached $6.8 billion, with the UAE topping the list of countries supplying Iran with over $3.9 billion, followed by Turkey at $1.98 billion, then Russia at $353 million, and Oman at $223 million.

According to the same data, the volume of non-oil trade between Iran and neighboring countries continued to rise, recording an increase of 21% year-on-year until March 19, 2025, reaching $74.32 billion, with exports rising to $36.01 billion compared to imports of $38.31 billion.

Despite concerns expressed by Iraq, the UAE, and Oman regarding the impact of the US tariffs, the decision has not yet included clear details on the implementation mechanism or any potential exemptions. In this context, the UAE Minister of Foreign Trade, Thani Al Zeyoudi, stated that his country is monitoring the situation to determine the extent of the decision’s impact on food imports.

Turkey is also facing a state of confusion as its trade with the United States expands from $30 billion to $100 billion, but it knows how to deal with such situations without a direct clash with Washington, according to analyst Taha Aydinoglu.

In contrast, China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil, continues to protect its interests and oppose any unilateral sanctions, while European economies such as Germany and Switzerland, along with India and Uzbekistan, also appear to be exposed to the impact of this tariff, reflecting the widening commercial reach of Iran across different continents.

Shafaq.com

Kurdistan Region demands seven months’ salary from Baghdad and suggests extending the oil agreement: unless there are objections.

The Kurdistan Regional Government announced on Wednesday that it will demand the next federal government fund the salaries of seven months that have not been paid to public sector employees and workers in the region over the past three years, while expecting an extension of the agreement concluded between Erbil and Baghdad regarding Kurdistan’s oil exports.

This came in a press conference held by the spokesman for the regional government, Peshwa Hawrami, following a session of the Kurdistan Council of Ministers, during which he expressed his concern about the continued targeting of Kurds in the Syrian city of Aleppo by government forces.

Hormani said at the conference, “After the formation of the new Iraqi government, the Kurdistan Regional Government will hold talks with officials in Baghdad regarding the issue of Kurdistan’s share of the federal budget,” adding that “the federal government has not funded the salaries of employees in the Kurdistan Region for 7 months during the past three years, and we will not give them up, and we will demand them all.”

He added, “We will not discuss the issue of salaries with the next federal government again, but we will talk about the region’s share of the budget,” noting that “according to the general population census, the Kurdistan Region’s share of the Iraqi federal budget is 14%, but so far what has been given to Kurdistan has been much less than its legal and constitutional rights.”

The speaker referred to the oil agreement concluded between Erbil and Baghdad, as a result of which the Kurdistan Region’s oil exports were resumed through the Turkish port of Ceyhan in September of last year.

Horamani said, “The agreement between the Kurdistan Region and the federal government was originally intended for a period of three months, and if no party objects to that agreement, it will be renewed automatically.”

Regarding the attack that targeted the Kormor gas field in Sulaymaniyah last year, the spokesman said, “We did not reach a conclusion that we would hand over an accused person for the drone attacks,” stressing that “there was a committee made up of the Iraqi government and the regional government, during which several meetings were held, and several names were mentioned, but they were not arrested.”

He continued, saying, “It is clear that the attacks originated from territories under the control of the federal government, and the accused and suspected individuals have not only not been arrested, but some of them even appeared on social media days ago boasting about their inability to apprehend them,” noting that “the guarantees previously given to us have still been repeated, and yet they have launched the attacks again.”

Regarding the escalation between the United States and Iran, Hormani said that the Kurdistan Regional Government is not biased towards any party in regional conflicts, and that no neighboring country has been allowed to be attacked from their territory. He emphasized, “We want to protect our citizens, and we demand protection for the rest of the people as well.”

Shafaq.com

The Iraqi parliament announces only 15 names that meet the requirements for candidacy for the position of President of the Republic.

The Presidency of the Iraqi Parliament announced today, Wednesday, the names of the candidates who met the legal requirements to run for the position of President of the Republic of Iraq, based on the provisions of Article (4) of the Law on the Provisions of Nomination for the Position No. (8) of 2012.

The Presidency stated in an official announcement, received by Shafaq News Agency, that the names listed below meet the conditions stipulated in Article (1) of the aforementioned law, namely:

Shwan Hawiz, Namiq Team

Ahmed Abdullah Tawfiq Ahmed

Hussein Taha Hassan Mohammed Sinjari

Najm al-Din Abdul Karim Hama Karim Nasrallah

Asu Faridun Ali

Saman Ali Ismail Shali

Sabah Saleh Saeed

Abdullah Muhammad Ali Zahir

Abdul Latif Muhammad Jamal Rashid Sheikh Muhammad

Iqbal Abdullah Amin Haliwi

Nizar Mohammed Saeed Mohammed Kanji

Sardar Abdullah Mahmood Times

Fouad Mohamed Hussein Baki

Muthanna Amin Nader

Nawzad Hadi Mouloud

The Speaker of Parliament explained that anyone whose name did not appear among the candidates who met the legal requirements, and who submitted applications to run for the position of President of the Republic, has the right to object to the Federal Supreme Court by submitting a written request exempt from legal fees, within a period not exceeding three days from the date of this announcement.

The number of candidates for the position of President of the Republic exceeded 80 candidates from various religious, sectarian and national groups.

The Iraqi parliament has set January 5 as the deadline for submitting applications to run for the presidency.

Shafaq.com

Maliki to Harris: The need to “control weapons” and complete constitutional requirements

On Wednesday, Nouri al-Maliki, head of the State of Law Coalition, stressed to Joshua Harris, the acting US ambassador to Iraq, the need to restrict weapons, and also discussed with him the issue of constitutional entitlements.

This came during Al-Maliki’s reception of Harris at his office today. According to a statement from his office received by Shafaq News Agency, the meeting included “discussions on ways to strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries, with the aim of serving the interests of the two friendly peoples. The two sides also reviewed developments in regional and international affairs.”

According to the statement, Maliki expressed “Iraq’s desire to continue cooperation and establish strong relations and a partnership with the United States by activating the Strategic Framework Agreement concluded between the two countries.”

Al-Maliki stated that “the national forces are determined to complete the constitutional requirements within their constitutional timeframes,” stressing that “building a strong and stable state requires restricting weapons to the state and strengthening the rule of law.”

For his part, Joshua Harris expressed his hope to “work on strengthening cooperation between Baghdad and Washington in a way that contributes to supporting security and stability in Iraq and the region.”

Zuhair al-Jalabi, a member of the State of Law Coalition, told Shafaq News Agency on December 3, 2025, that his leader, Nouri al-Maliki, was the only person capable of disarming the armed factions of their “heavy” weapons, due to their trust in him.

Al-Jalabi explained that “the armed factions, as well as the Popular Mobilization Forces, trust al-Maliki, and when al-Maliki assumes the premiership, he can negotiate the withdrawal of heavy weapons by the factions.”

He pointed out that “the factions trust Maliki and do not trust anyone else, which enables him to succeed in this matter, unlike all the heads of government who did not succeed in it, and this point can help Maliki in supporting his obtaining a third term.”

For years, the Iraqi government has been grappling with the issue of “weapons outside the framework of the state,” asserting that the proliferation of medium and heavy weapons among some factions poses a challenge to strengthening stability and establishing the rule of law.

The outgoing Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, believes that disarming the armed factions is linked to the presence of the international coalition in Iraq, which some factions consider an occupying force.

He explained, during an interview with Reuters, that Iraq is committed to putting all weapons under state control, and that the future program will include integrating factions into the security forces or politics by surrendering their weapons.

Meanwhile, Nouri al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law Coalition, says that “the armed factions have expressed their desire to integrate into state institutions and hand over their heavy weapons.”

For its part, the United States continues its repeated calls to Baghdad to ensure that armed factions are controlled and that attacks targeting US forces or interests are reduced, while affirming its support for the government’s efforts to strengthen security institutions.

Shafaq.com

Iran threatens to bomb US bases, and calls for help are made from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

Tehran has warned countries in the region that it will bomb US military bases in those countries if it is attacked by the US, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing a senior Iranian official. The official stated that “Tehran has informed countries in the region, from Saudi Arabia and the UAE to Turkey, that US bases in those countries will be attacked if the United States targets Iran… and has asked these countries to prevent Washington from attacking Iran.”

This came in the wake of threats by US President Donald Trump to intervene amid anti-government protests across Iran. Reuters reported, citing three diplomats, that some individuals were advised to leave the US military’s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar by Wednesday evening, adding that the US Embassy in Doha offered no immediate comment on the matter.

Al Udeid Air Base is the largest US base in the Middle East, housing approximately 10,000 troops. Prior to the US airstrikes on Iran in June, some personnel were relocated from US bases in the Middle East.

The Iranian official confirmed that direct contacts between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and US Special Envoy Steve Wittkopf have been suspended, adding that US threats are undermining diplomatic efforts and that any potential meetings between the two officials to find a diplomatic solution to the decades-long nuclear dispute have been cancelled.

Yesterday, US President Donald Trump announced that he had cancelled all meetings with Iranian officials “until the killing of protesters stops,” calling on those participating in the protests to continue demonstrating, and assuring them that “help is coming.”

The United States and other countries had urged their citizens to leave Iran as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal, citing officials in Gulf states, revealed that the administration of US President Donald Trump informed its allies that an attack on Iran had become “more likely than not.”

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that Saudi Arabia is leading a Gulf front that includes Qatar and Oman, in order to dissuade the White House from launching a strike against Iran, fearing the repercussions of this step on the stability of the region.

Burathanews.com

Three trillion dinars annually: A parliamentary plan reveals Iraq’s path towards oil self-sufficiency.

On Tuesday (January 13, 2026), MP Mudhar Al-Karawi presented a comprehensive strategic vision regarding the expansion of oil refineries in the country, stressing that it would support the general budget by no less than three trillion dinars annually, and contribute to creating three positive dimensions for the national economy.

Al-Karawi said in a press statement: “Expanding oil refineries in Iraq represents a strategic option with significant dimensions, based on approved technical and economic plans. Therefore, we adopt this path because it achieves three main objectives, most notably enhancing energy security, reducing dependence on imports, and maximizing the added value of crude oil.”

He adds that “this approach also contributes to supporting the national economy and protecting the country from fluctuations in global oil prices, especially since the oil derivatives market is one of the most important and fastest growing markets in the region and the world.”

Al-Karawi pointed out that “attempts to cast doubt on this program are not based on any sound scientific or economic data, and therefore it is necessary to move forward with this file because it reflects a true understanding of energy and oil industry policies, and is consistent with the requirements of long-term strategic planning that the state should adopt.”

He stressed that “expanding refineries and increasing their production capacity can contribute to supplying the treasury with revenues of at least three trillion dinars annually, which makes this program not a circumstantial option or an individual effort, but rather a fundamental pillar for achieving economic and political stability, and an important part of the comprehensive national security system.”

On January 9, 2026, economist Nabil Al-Marsoumi confirmed that oil prices had risen significantly due to escalating concerns about supplies from Iran.

Al-Marsoumi stated in a Facebook post that “the price of Brent crude rose to $63 as a result of concerns about disruptions to Iranian supplies, which produce 3.3 million barrels per day and export more than one million barrels.”

He added that “oil prices could see a significant increase if the current demonstrations and protests in Tehran turn into a military clash between Iran and both the Zionist entity and America, as happened in the last war.”

He added that “the global energy market could be severely shaken if Iran targets Gulf oil facilities or the Strait of Hormuz, because geopolitical tensions would directly affect supplies, as the region currently exports a third of global exports and a fifth of gas exports.”

Burathanews.com

Harris assures Barzani: There is no place for Iranian-backed terrorist militias in the Iraqi government.

On Tuesday, the acting US ambassador to Iraq, Joshua Harris, praised the role of Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani in supporting the Iraqi political process and calming tensions in Syria, while stressing that there is “no place” for what he called “Iranian-backed terrorist militias” in the next Iraqi government.

A statement from Barzani’s headquarters, received by Shafaq News Agency, said that “Masoud Barzani received at the Salah al-Din resort (Pir Mam), a delegation from the US Embassy in Iraq headed by Joshua Harris, the US Chargé d’Affaires in Iraq.”

The statement noted that during the meeting, which was attended by Gwendolyn Green, the US Consul General in Erbil, the US Chargé d’Affaires briefed the US Embassy on the political process in Iraq following the parliamentary elections, relations between Iraqi political parties, and efforts to form a unified federal government in Iraq.

He noted that the acting US ambassador also highlighted the situation in the region and the complexities in Syria, praising President Barzani’s continued efforts to support the Iraqi political process and calm tensions in Syria.

For his part, Barzani assured the visiting delegation that he would spare no effort in coordinating between the political parties to reach satisfactory results and form a strong federal government. He also said he would continue his efforts to resolve all problems and obstacles between the political parties on the one hand, and to address outstanding issues between the Kurdistan Regional Government and the federal government on the other.

Regarding the situation in Syria and the challenges facing the region in general, Barzani stressed that he is making serious efforts to resolve all problems peacefully through dialogue and understanding, and away from violence.

The statement concluded by saying that the meeting addressed another topic concerning relations between the Kurdistan Region and the United States, and efforts to strengthen and develop these relations.

For its part, the US Embassy in Baghdad said that Chargé d’Affaires Joshua Harris met with Masoud Barzani and discussed a number of political, security and economic issues.

The embassy said in a statement that the meeting addressed the importance of protecting Iraqi sovereignty, enhancing regional security, and strengthening mutually beneficial economic relations.

Harris reiterated, according to the statement, that “Iranian-backed terrorist militias, which ignore Iraq’s calls for disarmament, have no place in the Iraqi government in any capacity.”

The US chargé d’affaires stressed that the United States will continue to emphasize clearly and consistently the need for Iraq to act urgently to dismantle the terrorist militias that seek to achieve a foreign agenda that undermines Iraq’s sovereignty, impoverishes it, threatens Americans and Iraqis, and drags the country into a regional conflict.

Shafaq.com

The Trump administration designates Muslim Brotherhood branches in three countries as terrorist organizations.

On Tuesday, the administration of US President Donald Trump decided to designate the branches of the Muslim Brotherhood in Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan as “terrorist organizations”.

The US Treasury Department has designated the group’s branches in Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan as terrorist organizations.

US Secretary of State Mike Rubio said, “These measures are among the first steps in efforts to thwart violence perpetrated by branches of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Rubio added, “We will use the tools available to deprive these branches of the Muslim Brotherhood of the resources to engage in terrorism.”

The White House announced on November 25, 2025, that US President Donald Trump had signed an executive order directing the Secretaries of State and the Treasury to study whether specific branches of the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as “foreign terrorist organizations and specially designated international terrorists.”

It is worth noting that the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan is a dissolved group, and its activities were officially banned in April of last year, with it being considered an “illegal association” and any activity by it or the promotion of its ideas being prohibited, based on a previous judicial decision issued in 2020 that considered it “dissolved”.

Shafaq.com

The coordinating body will meet early next week to decide on al-Maliki’s nomination for prime minister.

An informed source revealed on Tuesday that the Shiite Coordination Framework forces will hold their periodic meeting early next week to decide on the nomination of State of Law Coalition leader Nouri al-Maliki for the position of Prime Minister in the new government.

The source told Shafaq News Agency that “the Shiite House forces will hold their meeting next Saturday to discuss a number of issues, including understandings between some of the active forces within the coordination framework and the political scene.”

He explained that the meeting would include “discussing the issue of nominating Maliki for the next government, and assessing the final positions of the framework leaders regarding Maliki’s nomination for the premiership for the third time.”

The source also indicated that “the withdrawal and resignation of the leader of the Reconstruction and Development Coalition, the outgoing Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, from the race to win the premiership for the second time seems to have been a political tactic in order to put al-Maliki in front of the coordination framework, especially since there are some parties that do not want al-Maliki to return to power amidst the upcoming challenges and changes internally and regionally.”

He pointed out that the coordinating framework wants to form “a strong government acceptable to all political parties, capable of achieving balance in managing the next phase, in addition to assessing the general situation and ending the state of political stagnation and deadlock, along with other issues.”

The source added that “the issue of side understandings between some of the framework forces will also be discussed, in reference to (the understandings between the Reconstruction and Development bloc and the State of Law coalition and the formation of a unified parliamentary front), and the effects of this on the Shiite house, as it may cause the disintegration of the coordination framework.”

The spokesman for the Reconstruction and Development Coalition, Firas al-Muslawi, confirmed yesterday, Monday, that the head of the coalition, Muhammad Shia al-Sudani, had withdrawn his candidacy for the position of Prime Minister in favor of the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, while revealing the formation of the “largest parliamentary bloc” between the two coalitions.

Al-Muslawi told Shafaq News Agency, “The coordination framework made a decision to authorize Al-Sudani and Al-Maliki to agree on the nomination of a candidate for the next prime minister. More than one meeting took place between them to discuss the government program and the upcoming challenges. Therefore, we and the leadership of the Reconstruction and Development Coalition unanimously decided (leaders and members) that Al-Sudani would withdraw his nomination in favor of Al-Maliki.”

He added that “the decision came to break the deadlock in the matter of choosing a framework candidate for the premiership and to adhere to constitutional timelines, and for several other reasons, including our concern for the interest of Iraq,” indicating that “the names included in the list of candidates are obscure names and cannot be named for this important position, which is the highest executive authority in the country.”

It is noted that a source within the Shiite coordination framework revealed to Shafaq News Agency that the forces that met last Saturday at the home of the leader of the Iraqi Foundation Coalition, Mohsen al-Mandalawi, sought clarification on the reasons that prompted the outgoing Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, to withdraw from the nomination and give space to the leader of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, to run.

According to the source, Maliki’s nomination was supported by most of the Coordination leaders, with the exception of the leader of the Wisdom Movement, Ammar al-Hakim, who sought the opinion of the religious authority and sent a message to the religious authority in Najaf. However, the latter renewed its refusal to interfere in the nomination of the prime minister, and thus the competition became limited to Maliki only.

Since the ratification of the election results held in November 2025, the Coordination Framework has begun holding meetings and conducting discussions among its forces and with other parties to decide on the position of Prime Minister, which is allocated to the Shiite component according to the custom in place after 2003.

Shafaq.com

Exclusive: American assessments: Striking Iran is “likely,” and Iraq is in danger.

The president of the Institute for Global Policy in Washington, Paulo Van Schirach, ruled out the possibility that US President Donald Trump would stand idly by in the face of the crackdown on protests in Iran, suggesting that a US military strike against “sensitive” targets inside Iran was likely, despite his warning of the risks of a retaliatory response that could affect US bases in Iraq and the Gulf.

Van Schirach told Shafaq News Agency that “Trump had previously warned the regime in Tehran that the United States would take action if the protesters were met with a harsh response.”

He added: “We clearly see that Iranian security forces are killing, beating, and arresting people, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump said: ‘I warned you and you did it, now I’m going to act.’”

Target Bank

Regarding the nature of the expected American response, the expert explained that the American administration may seek to strike “sensitive targets” such as military installations, factories, and headquarters of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

Van Schirach continued, saying that “Washington may also attack oil facilities and oil depots with the aim of weakening the regime, but the challenge lies in choosing targets that do not cause large civilian casualties, because attacking streets crowded with people would be a crazy idea.”

He pointed out that “the most important question remains (will it be a symbolic strike for show only, as happened previously, or a strike intended to cause serious damage to the system to facilitate a real rebellion?),” adding: “It is difficult to know what is going on in the administration’s mind right now, but the options are many.”

Van Schirach pointed out the difficulty of predicting the actions of the American president, saying that “Trump is an unpredictable figure; sometimes he threatens and does not act, as happened with Putin and Ukraine when he gave deadlines and nothing happened. There is a kind of inconsistency that makes prediction difficult.”

According to the American expert, if the Iranian regime continues its repression after an initial strike, there may be a sustained bombing campaign until they stop, although Trump does not want an invasion of Iran and does not want to see American soldiers killed abroad because that would cause him political problems.

Danger in Iraq and the region

Van Schirach also warned of the repercussions of any American attack on the region, pointing to Iranian threats of retaliation, explaining that “the Iranian regime has clearly stated that it will respond to American military targets, given the presence of American bases and a US presence in Iraq, Syria, Qatar and Bahrain.”

He concluded by saying that “Iran is not strong at the moment, but it or its proxies may resort to retaliation in these areas, which makes the scene chaotic, and yet I cannot rule out American military action in any way.”

Earlier on Tuesday, US officials reported that they had presented US President Donald Trump with new options regarding military strikes against Iran, but he had not yet made a final decision on the matter, according to US press reports.

On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on countries that do business with Iran, while simultaneously considering military action against the Iranian regime.

Shafaq.com